Medicaid Renewals Playbook

Unnecessary reverifications

Description

When renewing Medicaid coverage, states only need to reverify information subject to change. While there is no authoritative list of items “subject to change”, a combination of CMS guidance, regulation, research, and common sense has determine a list of items that do (or do not) fall into these categories.

Items that are NOT considered subject to change:

Items that are considered subject to change:

However, states may be over-verifying items that are not subject to change unnecessarily. This can result in people failing out of ex parte due to data unavailability, or data source errors. It’s also been observed that some states consider certain types of verifications “better” than others; an electronic verification is considered more reliable than a paper verification, for example, and paper verifications are re-verified on renewal. This is not grounded in any policy or regulation, and simply results in more work for both eligibility workers and clients.

What this looks like

Some signs a state may be verifiying unnecessarily:

Potential solutions

Rely on policy, regulation, guidance, and the examples of other states to get policy alignment on what needs to be re-verified (and what doesn’t). After alignment is obtained, the checks can simply be removed.